PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDU.TO (iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF) and XMS.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - XDU.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while XMS.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDU.TO returned 9.04%/yr vs 5.12%/yr for XMS.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDU.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for XMS.TO.

Performance

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDU.TO achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly higher than XMS.TO's 1.17% return.

XDU.TO

1D
0.36%
1M
5.28%
YTD
11.82%
6M
6.05%
1Y
16.98%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
—

XMS.TO

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.94%
YTD
1.17%
6M
-0.55%
1Y
0.08%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
5.12%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF		11.82%2.42%14.09%3.53%1.36%20.68%-1.03%15.73%4.46%3.74%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.17%3.71%14.23%7.84%-11.15%21.02%1.81%26.70%-1.63%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XDU.TO and XMS.TO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.49

The correlation between XDU.TO and XMS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDU.TO
XMS.TO

Healthcare

20.7%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%
9.9%

Technology

13.8%
29.8%

Industrials

12.4%
6.2%

Energy

12.3%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
6.2%

Financial Services

9.3%
14.0%

Utilities

3.8%
7.5%

Communication Services

2.6%
5.9%

Basic Materials

1.2%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Healthcare

XDU.TO
20.7%
XMS.TO
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

XDU.TO
14.6%
XMS.TO
9.9%

Technology

XDU.TO
13.8%
XMS.TO
29.8%

Industrials

XDU.TO
12.4%
XMS.TO
6.2%

Energy

XDU.TO
12.3%
XMS.TO
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XDU.TO
9.4%
XMS.TO
6.2%

Financial Services

XDU.TO
9.3%
XMS.TO
14.0%

Utilities

XDU.TO
3.8%
XMS.TO
7.5%

Communication Services

XDU.TO
2.6%
XMS.TO
5.9%

Basic Materials

XDU.TO
1.2%
XMS.TO
2.1%

Real Estate

XDU.TO

-

XMS.TO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XDU.TO:
XDU.TO vs. XDG.TOXDU.TO vs. SCHDXDU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDU.TO vs. XHD.TOXDU.TO vs. XUS.TOXDU.TO vs. XIU.TOXDU.TO vs. VFV.TO
Often compared with XMS.TO:
XMS.TO vs. XMU.TOXMS.TO vs. VFV.TOXMS.TO vs. VSP.TOXMS.TO vs. XUS.TOXMS.TO vs. SPYXMS.TO vs. ZSP.TOXMS.TO vs. ZLU.TO

Return for Risk

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDU.TO
XDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
XMS.TO
XMS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDU.TOXMS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.58
0.01

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.20
0.07

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.01

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

0.01

+2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

0.03

+8.20

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDU.TO and XMS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDU.TOXMS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

0.01

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.43

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.53

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.54

+0.02

Drawdowns

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum XMS.TO drawdown of -36.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDU.TO and XMS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDU.TOXMS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.12%

-36.48%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-6.91%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-9.82%

-6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.69%

-19.23%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.48%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-1.73%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-4.26%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.54%

-0.47%

Volatility

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) at 2.35%. This indicates that XDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDU.TOXMS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.35%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

6.14%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

8.75%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.08%

12.11%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

14.74%

+0.17%

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDU.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XMS.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than XMS.TO's 1.18% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF		2.25%2.46%2.12%2.31%2.05%2.06%2.72%2.31%2.27%1.27%0.00%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.18%1.08%1.21%1.38%1.20%0.99%1.66%1.40%1.54%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDU.TO and XMS.TO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDU.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDU.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for XMS.TO.

XDU.TO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while XMS.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. XDU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while XMS.TO tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (USD) 100% Hedged to CAD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XDU.TO and 0.33% for XMS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDU.TO and XMS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer