PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

XDU.TO (iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF) and XDGH.TO (iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Quality Factor funds from iShares - XDU.TO tracks the Morningstar US Market TR CAD while XDGH.TO tracks the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDU.TO returned 9.52%/yr vs 9.58%/yr for XDGH.TO. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XDU.TO charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XDGH.TO.

Performance

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDU.TO achieves a 17.37% return, which is significantly higher than XDGH.TO's 13.52% return.

XDU.TO

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.32%
6M
10.78%
YTD
17.37%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
9.04%

XDGH.TO

1D
0.21%
1M
0.58%
6M
9.59%
YTD
13.52%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
13.75%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

XDGH.TO

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
CA$126.08KCA$94.81KCA$68.81K

XDU.TO

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF
CA$87.34KCA$130.76KCA$120.57K

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF		17.37%2.51%14.32%3.75%-3.70%28.08%-0.76%15.98%4.69%-1.93%
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		13.52%14.60%10.49%9.52%-1.31%15.69%-4.23%22.41%-8.05%8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XDU.TO and XDGH.TO is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.44

Over the past year, XDU.TO and XDGH.TO have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDU.TO
XDGH.TO

Healthcare

20.2%
22.1%

Industrials

14.5%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

13.7%
14.9%

Technology

13.0%
5.9%

Energy

10.2%
10.3%

Financial Services

10.2%
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.6%

Utilities

3.6%
5.9%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.3%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Healthcare

XDU.TO
20.2%
XDGH.TO
22.1%

Industrials

XDU.TO
14.5%
XDGH.TO
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

XDU.TO
13.7%
XDGH.TO
14.9%

Technology

XDU.TO
13.0%
XDGH.TO
5.9%

Energy

XDU.TO
10.2%
XDGH.TO
10.3%

Financial Services

XDU.TO
10.2%
XDGH.TO
14.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XDU.TO
9.4%
XDGH.TO
9.6%

Utilities

XDU.TO
3.6%
XDGH.TO
5.9%

Communication Services

XDU.TO
3.6%
XDGH.TO
3.0%

Basic Materials

XDU.TO
1.8%
XDGH.TO
2.3%

Real Estate

XDU.TO

-

XDGH.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF

iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XDU.TO:
XDU.TO vs. XDG.TOXDU.TO vs. SCHDXDU.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDU.TO vs. XHD.TOXDU.TO vs. XUS.TOXDU.TO vs. VFV.TOXDU.TO vs. XIU.TO
Often compared with XDGH.TO:
XDGH.TO vs. XDG.TOXDGH.TO vs. XHD.TOXDGH.TO vs. XEQT.TOXDGH.TO vs. XDUH.TOXDGH.TO vs. VFV.TOXDGH.TO vs. VIDY.TOXDGH.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
XDU.TO
XDU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO
XDGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XDU.TOXDGH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.73
2.36

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.37
3.49

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.70

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.43

11.05

-1.62

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the XDGH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDU.TO and XDGH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.56%, smaller than the maximum XDGH.TO drawdown of -34.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDU.TO and XDGH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDU.TOXDGH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.56%

-34.91%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.13%

-6.38%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.67%

-11.96%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-16.06%

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

-1.00%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-4.60%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.13%

-0.04%

Volatility

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDU.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XDGH.TO) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDU.TOXDGH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.29%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

7.77%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

10.07%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.54%

14.47%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.89%

23.32%

+5.57%

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDU.TO has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than XDGH.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDU.TO vs. XDGH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than XDGH.TO's 2.67% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDGH.TO
iShares Core MSCI Global Quality Dividend Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.67%2.81%3.04%3.41%3.20%3.13%3.35%2.92%3.40%1.27%
XDU.TO
iShares Core MSCI US Quality Dividend Index ETF		2.42%2.54%2.31%2.53%2.25%2.13%2.99%2.54%2.49%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDU.TO and XDGH.TO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDU.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDU.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XDGH.TO.

XDU.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while XDGH.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XDU.TO and 0.22% for XDGH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDU.TO and XDGH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer