PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDTE vs. IWMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDTE vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDTE achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 16.70% return.


XDTE

1D
0.05%
1M
2.01%
6M
9.93%
YTD
11.29%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.24%

IWMY

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.76%
6M
12.26%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$616.15K$697.32K$976.93K
$7.06M$7.78M$7.52M

XDTE vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
11.29%12.60%17.12%
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
16.70%10.18%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XDTE and IWMY is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.74

The correlation between XDTE and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDTE vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XDTE
XDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IWMY
IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDTE vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) and Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDTEIWMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.23

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

1.85

+0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

6.01

+5.87

XDTE vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDTE and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDTE vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDTE drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, roughly equal to the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDTE and IWMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDTEIWMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.09%

-18.72%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.68%

-11.57%

+3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.39%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-2.87%

+0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

3.56%

-1.75%

Volatility

XDTE vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) is 3.60%, while Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that XDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDTEIWMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.10%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

13.58%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

16.36%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

15.81%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.85%

15.81%

-1.96%

XDTE vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDTE vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

XDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.42%, less than IWMY's 40.65% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IWMY
Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF
40.65%63.33%107.92%11.34%
XDTE
Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
31.42%39.16%20.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDTE and IWMY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWMY has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to XDTE (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDTE dropped -19.09% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

On 1-year performance, XDTE leads with 21.42% vs 21.33% for IWMY. On fees, XDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. On volatility, XDTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XDTE has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 21.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for IWMY.

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 40.65%, compared with 31.42% for XDTE.

XDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while IWMY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for XDTE and 1.05% for IWMY.

XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDTE and IWMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer