PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDSQ vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDSQ vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDSQ vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


XDSQ

1D
2.74%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
13.87%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDSQ vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XDSQ vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDSQ vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDSQDWATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.87

XDSQ vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDSQDWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

Dividends

XDSQ vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDSQ nor DWAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XDSQ vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and DWAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDSQDWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

0.00%

-26.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.12%

0.00%

-7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

0.00%

-5.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

Volatility

XDSQ vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDSQDWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

0.00%

+17.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

0.00%

+15.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

0.00%

+15.32%