XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDRE.DE (Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C) and H4Z7.DE (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both REIT funds - XDRE.DE tracks the Dow Jones Developed Green Real Estate Index while H4Z7.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XDRE.DE returned 9.60% vs 9.70% for H4Z7.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XDRE.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for H4Z7.DE.

Performance

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDRE.DE achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than H4Z7.DE's 7.83% return.

XDRE.DE

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.53%
• YTD: 7.27%
• 6M: 6.71%
• 1Y: 9.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

H4Z7.DE

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -1.09%
• YTD: 7.83%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 9.70%
• 3Y*: 6.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XDRE.DE Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C	7.27%	-2.46%	-3.63%
H4Z7.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	7.83%	-1.78%	-3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XDRE.DE and H4Z7.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024	0.96

The correlation between XDRE.DE and H4Z7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDRE.DE

XDRE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 26
XDRE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
XDRE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XDRE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XDRE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XDRE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

H4Z7.DE

H4Z7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 25
H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
H4Z7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
H4Z7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
H4Z7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
H4Z7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDRE.DE	H4Z7.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	0.86	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	1.26	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.15	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.23	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	3.99	+0.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDRE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDRE.DE and H4Z7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDRE.DE	H4Z7.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	0.86	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.08	-0.04

Drawdowns

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDRE.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, smaller than the maximum H4Z7.DE drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDRE.DE and H4Z7.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDRE.DE	H4Z7.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.91%	-26.78%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.79%	-7.86%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-2.86%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.22%	-11.53%	+3.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	2.42%	-0.15%

Volatility

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDRE.DE	H4Z7.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	2.87%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.43%	8.56%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	11.25%	-0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.01%	14.42%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.01%	14.42%	-0.41%

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDRE.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than H4Z7.DE's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDRE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDRE.DE nor H4Z7.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDRE.DE and H4Z7.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, XDRE.DE and H4Z7.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XDRE.DE or H4Z7.DE?

On fees, XDRE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDRE.DE or H4Z7.DE?

XDRE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for H4Z7.DE.

What is the main difference between XDRE.DE and H4Z7.DE?

XDRE.DE tracks Dow Jones Developed Green Real Estate Index, while H4Z7.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XDRE.DE and 0.24% for H4Z7.DE.