PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDRE.DE achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than ESAD.DE's 7.67% return.


XDRE.DE

1D
0.41%
1M
0.53%
YTD
7.27%
6M
6.71%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESAD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
7.67%
6M
6.84%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XDRE.DE and ESAD.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2024

0.90

The correlation between XDRE.DE and ESAD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDRE.DE
XDRE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XDRE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDRE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDRE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XDRE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDRE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ESAD.DE
ESAD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESAD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDRE.DEESAD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.90

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.22

2.70

+1.52

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDRE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the ESAD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDRE.DE and ESAD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDRE.DEESAD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.63

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.12

+0.16

Drawdowns

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDRE.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, smaller than the maximum ESAD.DE drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDRE.DE and ESAD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDRE.DEESAD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-30.37%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-8.26%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-11.52%

+8.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-17.56%

+9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

2.75%

-0.48%

Volatility

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Developed Green Real Estate ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XDRE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDRE.DEESAD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.98%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

9.07%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

11.74%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

14.78%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.01%

14.78%

-0.77%

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDRE.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ESAD.DE's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDRE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDRE.DE nor ESAD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XDRE.DE and ESAD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDRE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDRE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for ESAD.DE.

XDRE.DE tracks Dow Jones Developed Green Real Estate Index, while ESAD.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XDRE.DE and 0.41% for ESAD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDRE.DE and ESAD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer