XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDPP.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C) and SPEP.L (Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - XDPP.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while SPEP.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDPP.L returned 19.33%/yr vs 18.82%/yr for SPEP.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XDPP.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPEP.L.

Performance

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDPP.L is traded in GBP, while SPEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPEP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDPP.L achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPEP.L's 9.52% return.

XDPP.L

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 6.00%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 29.16%
• 3Y*: 19.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPEP.L

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 5.57%
• YTD: 9.52%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 31.49%
• 3Y*: 18.82%
• 5Y*: 15.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XDPP.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C	10.57%	9.44%	27.26%	19.81%	2.54%
SPEP.L Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc	9.52%	9.94%	26.61%	21.47%	2.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPP.L and SPEP.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022	0.97

The correlation between XDPP.L and SPEP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPP.L

XDPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XDPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
XDPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XDPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XDPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

SPEP.L

SPEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SPEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
SPEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SPEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SPEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDPP.L	SPEP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	0.72	+2.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	1.44	+2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.48	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	1.13	+2.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.32	1.75	+12.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the SPEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPP.L and SPEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDPP.L	SPEP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	0.72	+2.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.59	+0.66

Drawdowns

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, smaller than the maximum SPEP.L drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPP.L and SPEP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDPP.L	SPEP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.98%	-27.82%	+6.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-27.82%	+20.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.98%	-27.82%	+6.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-16.33%	+16.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-7.47%	+3.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	17.90%	-15.87%

Volatility

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) is 2.62%, while Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (SPEP.L) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that XDPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDPP.L	SPEP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.81%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.13%	7.07%	+0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	43.33%	-32.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	31.49%	-17.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	30.10%	-16.20%

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDPP.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SPEP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XDPP.L vs. SPEP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDPP.L nor SPEP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDPP.L and SPEP.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, XDPP.L and SPEP.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XDPP.L or SPEP.L?

On fees, XDPP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDPP.L or SPEP.L?

XDPP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for SPEP.L.

What is the main difference between XDPP.L and SPEP.L?

XDPP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPEP.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XDPP.L and 0.09% for SPEP.L.