XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDPP.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C) and PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both S&P 500 funds - XDPP.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while PQVG.L tracks the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDPP.L returned 19.33%/yr vs 21.43%/yr for PQVG.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDPP.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVG.L.

Performance

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XDPP.L is traded in GBP, while PQVG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PQVG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDPP.L achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.37% return.

XDPP.L

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 6.00%
• YTD: 10.57%
• 6M: 10.57%
• 1Y: 29.16%
• 3Y*: 19.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQVG.L

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 6M: 16.32%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 21.43%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XDPP.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C	10.57%	9.44%	27.26%	19.81%	2.54%
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	16.37%	5.84%	32.29%	0.98%	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPP.L and PQVG.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022	0.73

The correlation between XDPP.L and PQVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.75 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPP.L

XDPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
XDPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
XDPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
XDPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XDPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PQVG.L

PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XDPP.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	2.29	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	3.27	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.40	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	5.78	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.32	17.38	-3.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPP.L and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDPP.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	2.29	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	0.89	+0.37

Drawdowns

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPP.L drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, smaller than the maximum PQVG.L drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPP.L and PQVG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDPP.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.98%	-25.88%	+4.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-4.11%	-3.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.98%	-17.44%	-3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.24%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-4.17%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	1.37%	+0.66%

Volatility

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) is 2.62%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that XDPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XDPP.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	2.80%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.13%	7.88%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.53%	10.40%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	14.89%	-0.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	16.25%	-2.35%

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDPP.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDPP.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

XDPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.78%	0.82%	0.82%	1.61%	1.77%	0.87%	1.59%	1.41%	1.30%	0.72%
XDPP.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XDPP.L and PQVG.L in my portfolio?

XDPP.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XDPP.L or PQVG.L?

On fees, XDPP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDPP.L or PQVG.L?

XDPP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.

What is the main difference between XDPP.L and PQVG.L?

XDPP.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XDPP.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.