XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L
XDPG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged) and XDPP.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C) are both S&P 500 funds from Xtrackers - XDPG.L tracks the S&P 500 GBP Hedged while XDPP.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDPG.L returned 21.39%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for XDPP.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDPG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for XDPP.L.
Performance
XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDPG.L is traded in GBp, while XDPP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XDPP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDPG.L achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than XDPP.L's 10.57% return.
XDPG.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 27.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
XDPP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.48%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged | 9.91% | 16.95% | 24.90% | 24.82% | 0.38% |
XDPP.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C | 10.57% | 9.44% | 27.26% | 19.81% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDPG.L and XDPP.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2022 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XDPG.L and XDPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDPG.L
XDPP.L
XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDPG.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.52 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 3.99 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 14.32 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDPG.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.78 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.25 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than XDPP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and XDPP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDPG.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -20.98% | -14.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -7.28% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -20.98% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.24% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -3.49% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.03% | -0.09% |
Volatility
XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 4C (XDPP.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that XDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDPG.L | XDPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 2.62% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 7.13% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 10.46% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 13.89% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 13.89% | +2.71% |
XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XDPP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDPG.L vs. XDPP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDPG.L nor XDPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDPG.L and XDPP.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDPP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDPP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDPG.L.
XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while XDPP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDPG.L and 0.06% for XDPP.L.
Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and XDPP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer