PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDPG.L vs. USLV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDPG.L is traded in GBp, while USLV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USLV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDPG.L achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly higher than USLV.L's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XDPG.L has outperformed USLV.L with an annualized return of 13.60%, while USLV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.39% annualized return.


XDPG.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.52%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.64%
1Y
27.07%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
13.60%

USLV.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.11%
YTD
1.11%
6M
0.76%
1Y
1.27%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
8.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDPG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged
9.91%16.95%24.90%24.82%-20.73%28.87%15.23%27.55%-7.58%19.91%
USLV.L
SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF
1.11%-2.67%15.49%-6.05%6.92%26.04%-5.76%22.99%4.45%6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPG.L and USLV.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

0.37

The correlation between XDPG.L and USLV.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDPG.L
USLV.L

Technology

35.6%
4.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
16.6%

Communication Services

11.2%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
6.8%

Industrials

8.3%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
10.8%

Energy

3.5%
0.9%

Utilities

2.4%
26.8%

Real Estate

1.9%
14.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.0%

Technology

XDPG.L
35.6%
USLV.L
4.6%

Financial Services

XDPG.L
11.8%
USLV.L
16.6%

Communication Services

XDPG.L
11.2%
USLV.L
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDPG.L
10.1%
USLV.L
5.7%

Healthcare

XDPG.L
8.5%
USLV.L
6.8%

Industrials

XDPG.L
8.3%
USLV.L
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

XDPG.L
4.9%
USLV.L
10.8%

Energy

XDPG.L
3.5%
USLV.L
0.9%

Utilities

XDPG.L
2.4%
USLV.L
26.8%

Real Estate

XDPG.L
1.9%
USLV.L
14.8%

Basic Materials

XDPG.L
1.8%
USLV.L
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPG.L
XDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

USLV.L
USLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
USLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
USLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDPG.LUSLV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.03

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

0.16

+3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

0.40

+13.53

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the USLV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPG.L and USLV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDPG.LUSLV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

0.12

+2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.50

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.60

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.78

-0.03

Drawdowns

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than USLV.L's maximum drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and USLV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDPG.LUSLV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-27.37%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-7.96%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-10.71%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-14.56%

-11.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

-27.37%

-8.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-7.23%

+6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-5.16%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.13%

-1.19%

Volatility

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) is 3.18%, while SPDR S&P 500 Low Volatility UCITS ETF (USLV.L) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that XDPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USLV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDPG.LUSLV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.76%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

8.01%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.62%

10.34%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

12.11%

+3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

14.00%

+2.60%

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than USLV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDPG.L vs. USLV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDPG.L nor USLV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDPG.L and USLV.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USLV.L.

XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while USLV.L tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDPG.L and 0.35% for USLV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and USLV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer