PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDPG.L is traded in GBp, while SPXE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPXE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDPG.L having a 8.53% return and SPXE.L slightly higher at 8.63%.


XDPG.L

1D
-1.21%
1M
-0.51%
6M
7.58%
YTD
8.53%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
13.16%

SPXE.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-2.67%
6M
7.06%
YTD
8.63%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDPG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged
8.53%16.95%24.90%24.82%-20.73%28.87%32.07%
SPXE.L
Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.63%9.57%26.72%21.98%-8.25%33.54%21.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPG.L and SPXE.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2020

0.80

The correlation between XDPG.L and SPXE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPG.L
XDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXE.L
SPXE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SPXE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDPG.LSPXE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.21

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

11.49

-2.18

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SPXE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPG.L and SPXE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than SPXE.L's maximum drawdown of -21.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and SPXE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDPG.LSPXE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-21.81%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-6.78%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-21.81%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-21.81%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-2.89%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-3.35%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

1.90%

+0.16%

Volatility

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) is 2.99%, while Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPXE.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that XDPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDPG.LSPXE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.26%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

9.35%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

12.18%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

15.66%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

18.23%

-1.68%

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDPG.L and SPXE.L have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDPG.L vs. SPXE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDPG.L nor SPXE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDPG.L and SPXE.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDPG.L and SPXE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while SPXE.L tracks S&P 500 Scored & Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and SPXE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer