PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDPG.L achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than IISU.L's 12.64% return.


XDPG.L

1D
0.02%
1M
4.52%
YTD
9.91%
6M
10.64%
1Y
27.07%
3Y*
21.39%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
13.60%

IISU.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.79%
YTD
12.64%
6M
13.01%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDPG.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged
9.91%16.95%24.90%24.82%-20.73%28.87%15.23%27.55%-7.58%15.17%
IISU.L
iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.64%11.24%19.29%11.45%6.06%22.20%6.25%24.46%-9.19%7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XDPG.L and IISU.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.64

The correlation between XDPG.L and IISU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDPG.L
IISU.L

Technology

35.6%
3.8%

Financial Services

11.8%

-

Communication Services

11.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
0.5%

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%
90.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.2%

Technology

XDPG.L
35.6%
IISU.L
3.8%

Financial Services

XDPG.L
11.8%
IISU.L

-

Communication Services

XDPG.L
11.2%
IISU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDPG.L
10.1%
IISU.L
0.5%

Healthcare

XDPG.L
8.5%
IISU.L

-

Industrials

XDPG.L
8.3%
IISU.L
90.4%

Consumer Defensive

XDPG.L
4.9%
IISU.L

-

Energy

XDPG.L
3.5%
IISU.L

-

Utilities

XDPG.L
2.4%
IISU.L
4.9%

Real Estate

XDPG.L
1.9%
IISU.L

-

Basic Materials

XDPG.L
1.8%
IISU.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDPG.L
XDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IISU.L
IISU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IISU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IISU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IISU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IISU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IISU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDPG.LIISU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.58

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

8.22

+5.71

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IISU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDPG.L and IISU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDPG.LIISU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.83

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.84

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.64

+0.11

Drawdowns

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, roughly equal to the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and IISU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDPG.LIISU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-34.66%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-9.36%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.07%

-21.12%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.62%

-21.12%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-1.34%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-4.51%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.95%

-1.01%

Volatility

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) is 3.18%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that XDPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDPG.LIISU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

4.54%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.59%

10.37%

-1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.62%

13.25%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

15.96%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

18.65%

-2.05%

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDPG.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDPG.L and IISU.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IISU.L.

XDPG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IISU.L is Industrials Equities. XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDPG.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and IISU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer