XDPG.L vs. IISU.L
XDPG.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged) and IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XDPG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while IISU.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDPG.L returned 12.48%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for IISU.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDPG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IISU.L.
Performance
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDPG.L achieves a 9.91% return, which is significantly lower than IISU.L's 12.64% return.
XDPG.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 27.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.39%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
IISU.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 18.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDPG.L Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged | 9.91% | 16.95% | 24.90% | 24.82% | -20.73% | 28.87% | 15.23% | 27.55% | -7.58% | 15.17% |
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.64% | 11.24% | 19.29% | 11.45% | 6.06% | 22.20% | 6.25% | 24.46% | -9.19% | 7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDPG.L and IISU.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XDPG.L and IISU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDPG.L
IISU.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
XDPG.L
IISU.L
Financial Services
XDPG.L
IISU.L
-
Communication Services
XDPG.L
IISU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDPG.L
IISU.L
Healthcare
XDPG.L
IISU.L
-
Industrials
XDPG.L
IISU.L
Consumer Defensive
XDPG.L
IISU.L
-
Energy
XDPG.L
IISU.L
-
Utilities
XDPG.L
IISU.L
Real Estate
XDPG.L
IISU.L
-
Basic Materials
XDPG.L
IISU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDPG.L
IISU.L
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDPG.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.58 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.93 | 8.22 | +5.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDPG.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.83 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.84 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.64 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, roughly equal to the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDPG.L and IISU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDPG.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.91% | -34.66% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -9.36% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.07% | -21.12% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.62% | -21.12% | -4.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -1.34% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -4.51% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.95% | -1.01% |
Volatility
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 UCITS ETF 2C - GBP Hedged (XDPG.L) is 3.18%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that XDPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDPG.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 4.54% | -1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 10.37% | -1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.62% | 13.25% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 15.96% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.60% | 18.65% | -2.05% |
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDPG.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDPG.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDPG.L and IISU.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IISU.L.
XDPG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IISU.L is Industrials Equities. XDPG.L tracks S&P 500 GBP Hedged, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDPG.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.
Find the right allocation for XDPG.L and IISU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer