XDOC vs. GMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October) and GMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. XDOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GMAR.

Performance

XDOC vs. GMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XDOC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMAR

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 8.66%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 12.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDOC vs. GMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XDOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October	0.00%
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	7.21%

XDOC vs. GMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDOC	GMAR
Technology	35.4%	36.2%
Financial Services	13.3%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	10.1%
Communication Services	10.6%	10.9%
Healthcare	8.7%	8.4%
Industrials	7.5%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.0%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

XDOC vs. GMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GMAR

GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDOC vs. GMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XDOC	GMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	1.91	—

Drawdowns

XDOC vs. GMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDOC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum GMAR drawdown of -9.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDOC and GMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDOC	GMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-9.11%	+9.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.79%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-0.54%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.26%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDOC	GMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	3.90%	-3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	6.84%	-6.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	6.84%	-6.84%

XDOC vs. GMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDOC vs. GMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDOC nor GMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XDOC or GMAR?

On fees, XDOC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDOC or GMAR?

XDOC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDOC or GMAR?

XDOC and GMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XDOC and GMAR?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDOC and 0.85% for GMAR.