PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDOC vs. FEBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDOC vs. FEBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDOC vs. FEBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


XDOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEBT

1D
2.03%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
-1.69%
6M
1.12%
1Y
14.62%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XDOC vs. FEBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FEBT's 0.74% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XDOC vs. FEBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDOC

FEBT
FEBT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FEBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEBT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FEBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEBT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDOC vs. FEBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XDOC vs. FEBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDOCFEBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

Dividends

XDOC vs. FEBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDOC nor FEBT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

XDOC vs. FEBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDOC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FEBT drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDOC and FEBT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XDOCFEBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.19%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.13%

+4.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.22%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

Volatility

XDOC vs. FEBT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XDOCFEBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

12.59%

-12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

9.88%

-9.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

9.88%

-9.88%