XDOC vs. APRQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October) and APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

XDOC vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XDOC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDOC vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XDOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October	0.00%
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%

XDOC vs. APRQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XDOC	APRQ
Technology	35.4%	32.0%
Financial Services	13.3%	13.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	11.6%
Communication Services	10.6%	9.9%
Healthcare	8.7%	10.5%
Industrials	7.5%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.5%
Energy	3.0%	3.2%
Utilities	2.4%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.1%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.7%

Return for Risk

XDOC vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

XDOC vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDOC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDOC and APRQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XDOC	APRQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XDOC	APRQ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

XDOC vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDOC and APRQ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

XDOC vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDOC nor APRQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XDOC or APRQ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XDOC or APRQ?

XDOC and APRQ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XDOC or APRQ?

XDOC and APRQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.