PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDNY.DE achieves a 15.90% return, which is significantly higher than QUEJ.DE's 7.21% return.


XDNY.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.52%
YTD
15.90%
6M
16.21%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
8.63%

QUEJ.DE

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.71%
YTD
7.21%
6M
7.26%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDNY.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
15.90%11.68%12.72%16.12%-8.36%
QUEJ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
7.21%3.79%1.15%8.13%-12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XDNY.DE and QUEJ.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.91

The correlation between XDNY.DE and QUEJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDNY.DE
XDNY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XDNY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QUEJ.DE
QUEJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDNY.DEQUEJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.12

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.00

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

2.91

+6.32

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDNY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDNY.DE and QUEJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDNY.DEQUEJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

0.60

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.09

+0.28

Drawdowns

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDNY.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, which is greater than QUEJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDNY.DE and QUEJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDNY.DEQUEJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.31%

-15.02%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-10.45%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-13.94%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-2.50%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-6.33%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.60%

-0.44%

Volatility

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDNY.DEQUEJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.38%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

13.72%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

17.39%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

15.36%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

15.36%

+1.18%

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDNY.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QUEJ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDNY.DE vs. QUEJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDNY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while QUEJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QUEJ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDNY.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
1.42%1.66%1.60%1.77%2.98%1.40%1.82%1.73%1.24%2.07%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDNY.DE and QUEJ.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDNY.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNY.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QUEJ.DE.

XDNY.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select ESG Screened, while QUEJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XDNY.DE and 0.25% for QUEJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDNY.DE and QUEJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer