PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDNY.DE having a 15.90% return and PRAJ.DE slightly lower at 15.60%.


XDNY.DE

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.52%
YTD
15.90%
6M
16.21%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
8.63%

PRAJ.DE

1D
-0.27%
1M
3.19%
YTD
15.60%
6M
15.73%
1Y
30.22%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDNY.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
15.90%11.68%12.72%16.12%-12.80%9.09%4.11%
PRAJ.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF
15.60%12.84%13.73%16.27%-11.68%10.20%4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XDNY.DE and PRAJ.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2020

0.97

The correlation between XDNY.DE and PRAJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDNY.DE
XDNY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XDNY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAJ.DE
PRAJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PRAJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRAJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDNY.DEPRAJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.97

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

9.64

-0.41

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDNY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the PRAJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDNY.DE and PRAJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDNY.DEPRAJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.57

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.60

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.51

-0.14

Drawdowns

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDNY.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.31%, roughly equal to the maximum PRAJ.DE drawdown of -29.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDNY.DE and PRAJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDNY.DEPRAJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.31%

-29.64%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

-9.73%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-16.80%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-18.65%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.27%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.48%

-6.07%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.01%

+0.15%

Volatility

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF (PRAJ.DE) have volatilities of 3.45% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDNY.DEPRAJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

3.41%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.05%

14.72%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

18.48%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

16.53%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

17.88%

-1.34%

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDNY.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAJ.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDNY.DE vs. PRAJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDNY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while PRAJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PRAJ.DE
Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDNY.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
1.42%1.66%1.60%1.77%2.98%1.40%1.82%1.73%1.24%2.07%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XDNY.DE and PRAJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRAJ.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XDNY.DE.

XDNY.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select ESG Screened, while PRAJ.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XDNY.DE and 0.05% for PRAJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDNY.DE and PRAJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer