PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDNY.DE achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly lower than NS4E.DE's 17.06% return. Over the past 10 years, XDNY.DE has underperformed NS4E.DE with an annualized return of 8.14%, while NS4E.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.


XDNY.DE

1D
-2.32%
1M
-4.30%
6M
7.46%
YTD
14.26%
1Y
30.85%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
8.14%

NS4E.DE

1D
-2.16%
1M
-2.98%
6M
9.96%
YTD
17.06%
1Y
42.35%
3Y*
25.18%
5Y*
19.49%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDNY.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
14.26%11.70%12.67%16.15%-12.83%9.07%4.79%22.35%-10.67%9.68%
NS4E.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)
17.06%27.33%22.81%33.35%-4.26%10.90%7.50%17.31%-17.52%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XDNY.DE and NS4E.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2015

0.84

The correlation between XDNY.DE and NS4E.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (5 years) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDNY.DE
XDNY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XDNY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

NS4E.DE
NS4E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDNY.DENS4E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

4.40

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.61

15.01

-5.40

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDNY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDNY.DE and NS4E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDNY.DE drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than NS4E.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDNY.DE and NS4E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDNY.DENS4E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-35.32%

-64.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-9.59%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-20.96%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.82%

-20.96%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.32%

-35.32%

+7.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.44%

-4.65%

-93.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-98.65%

-8.00%

-90.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.81%

+0.39%

Volatility

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNY.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.46% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) at 6.07%. This indicates that XDNY.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NS4E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDNY.DENS4E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.46%

6.07%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.22%

15.68%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.91%

19.57%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

18.21%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

18.20%

-1.62%

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDNY.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NS4E.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDNY.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDNY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while NS4E.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
NS4E.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDNY.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D
1.45%1.66%1.60%1.77%2.98%1.40%1.82%1.73%1.24%2.07%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, XDNY.DE and NS4E.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDNY.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNY.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NS4E.DE.

XDNY.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select ESG Screened, while NS4E.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XDNY.DE and 0.19% for NS4E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDNY.DE and NS4E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer