PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while XYLD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XYLD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD.L's 2.99% return.


XDJP.L

1D
2.07%
1M
9.43%
YTD
40.54%
6M
40.35%
1Y
72.07%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
13.28%

XYLD.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.23%
YTD
2.99%
6M
3.35%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
40.54%21.04%9.68%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.59%-0.35%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
2.99%-1.36%6.72%0.43%2.18%1.29%7.10%12.74%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and XYLD.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2018

0.11

The correlation between XDJP.L and XYLD.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD.L
XYLD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDJP.LXYLD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.21

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

1.51

+3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.00

4.29

+11.71

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the XYLD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and XYLD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than XYLD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and XYLD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDJP.LXYLD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-15.49%

-84.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-5.01%

-8.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-8.75%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-15.49%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-2.38%

-97.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-5.17%

-94.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

1.76%

+2.73%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D (XYLD.L) at 1.54%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDJP.LXYLD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

1.54%

+7.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.49%

4.85%

+14.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.95%

6.32%

+17.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

8.24%

+9.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

9.27%

+8.10%

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDJP.L vs. XYLD.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than XYLD.L's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
0.97%1.33%1.41%1.60%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%
XYLD.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond Short Duration SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1D
3.76%3.61%3.34%2.88%6.03%3.88%3.78%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDJP.L and XYLD.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XYLD.L.

XDJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XYLD.L is Corporate Bonds. XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XYLD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.16% for XYLD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and XYLD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer