PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while XUT3.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUT3.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than XUT3.L's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has outperformed XUT3.L with an annualized return of 13.28%, while XUT3.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


XDJP.L

1D
2.07%
1M
9.43%
YTD
40.54%
6M
40.35%
1Y
72.07%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
13.28%

XUT3.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.14%
YTD
2.74%
6M
3.19%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
40.54%21.04%9.68%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.59%-3.53%14.74%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.74%-2.42%5.95%-1.10%7.87%0.32%-0.08%-0.38%7.45%-8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and XUT3.L is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2013

0.18

The correlation between XDJP.L and XUT3.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XUT3.L
XUT3.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDJP.LXUT3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.19

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

1.29

+4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.00

3.51

+12.48

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the XUT3.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and XUT3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than XUT3.L's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and XUT3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDJP.LXUT3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-18.58%

-81.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-5.21%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-9.27%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-16.72%

-3.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

-18.58%

-5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-6.38%

-93.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-8.04%

-91.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

1.91%

+2.58%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D (XUT3.L) at 1.50%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUT3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDJP.LXUT3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

1.50%

+7.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.49%

4.93%

+14.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.95%

6.38%

+17.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

8.21%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

8.80%

+8.57%

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than XUT3.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDJP.L vs. XUT3.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than XUT3.L's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
0.97%1.33%1.41%1.60%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%
XUT3.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries 1-3 UCITS ETF 1D
2.84%2.70%2.35%1.80%1.00%2.89%2.43%1.16%1.00%0.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDJP.L and XUT3.L have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUT3.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUT3.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XDJP.L.

XDJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XUT3.L is Government Bonds. XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XUT3.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries 1-3 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.06% for XUT3.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and XUT3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer