XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L
XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) and XS6R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while XS6R.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L returned 13.28%/yr vs 12.07%/yr for XS6R.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDJP.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XS6R.L.
Performance
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than XS6R.L's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has outperformed XS6R.L with an annualized return of 13.28%, while XS6R.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.07% annualized return.
XDJP.L
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- 9.43%
- YTD
- 40.54%
- 6M
- 40.35%
- 1Y
- 72.07%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
XS6R.L
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 15.79%
- 1Y
- 29.09%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.07%
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 40.54% | 21.04% | 9.68% | 15.52% | -10.26% | -3.79% | 21.77% | 16.59% | -3.53% | 14.74% |
XS6R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 14.66% | 38.34% | -1.20% | 11.55% | -3.84% | 1.17% | 18.06% | 22.81% | 3.52% | 13.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDJP.L and XS6R.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2013 | 0.36 |
The correlation between XDJP.L and XS6R.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
Technology
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Technology
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Industrials
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Communication Services
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Healthcare
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Basic Materials
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Financial Services
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Real Estate
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Energy
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
-
Utilities
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDJP.L
XS6R.L
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDJP.L | XS6R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.34 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.35 | 3.17 | +2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.00 | 9.02 | +6.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than XS6R.L's maximum drawdown of -57.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and XS6R.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDJP.L | XS6R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -57.87% | -42.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | -9.14% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.82% | -16.65% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -21.38% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.69% | -27.10% | +3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -2.97% | -96.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -27.09% | -72.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 3.22% | +1.27% |
Volatility
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) at 3.31%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XS6R.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDJP.L | XS6R.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.38% | 3.31% | +6.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.49% | 12.85% | +6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 15.02% | +8.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 18.40% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 18.96% | -1.59% |
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XS6R.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDJP.L vs. XS6R.L - Dividend Comparison
XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while XS6R.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.97% | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.60% | 2.47% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.16% |
XS6R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDJP.L and XS6R.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS6R.L.
XDJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XS6R.L is Utilities Equities. XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XS6R.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.20% for XS6R.L.
Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and XS6R.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer