PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 40.54% return, which is significantly higher than XDAX.L's 0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has outperformed XDAX.L with an annualized return of 13.28%, while XDAX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.29% annualized return.


XDJP.L

1D
2.07%
1M
9.43%
YTD
40.54%
6M
40.35%
1Y
72.07%
3Y*
25.00%
5Y*
13.89%
10Y*
13.28%

XDAX.L

1D
0.97%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
0.17%
6M
0.99%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
9.40%
10Y*
8.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
40.54%21.04%9.68%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.59%-3.53%14.74%
XDAX.L
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.17%28.81%13.14%17.20%-7.58%7.86%9.38%16.48%-17.14%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and XDAX.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2013

0.57

The correlation between XDJP.L and XDAX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDJP.L
XDAX.L

Technology

33.3%
15.4%

Industrials

18.2%
34.1%

Consumer Cyclical

16.6%
7.3%

Communication Services

14.3%
6.2%

Healthcare

6.1%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.1%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.0%

Financial Services

2.9%
20.0%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.9%

Energy

0.3%

-

Utilities

0.1%
4.5%

Technology

XDJP.L
33.3%
XDAX.L
15.4%

Industrials

XDJP.L
18.2%
XDAX.L
34.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XDJP.L
16.6%
XDAX.L
7.3%

Communication Services

XDJP.L
14.3%
XDAX.L
6.2%

Healthcare

XDJP.L
6.1%
XDAX.L
5.5%

Basic Materials

XDJP.L
4.1%
XDAX.L
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

XDJP.L
2.9%
XDAX.L
1.0%

Financial Services

XDJP.L
2.9%
XDAX.L
20.0%

Real Estate

XDJP.L
1.2%
XDAX.L
0.9%

Energy

XDJP.L
0.3%
XDAX.L

-

Utilities

XDJP.L
0.1%
XDAX.L
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XDAX.L
XDAX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDAX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDJP.LXDAX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.09

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.35

0.53

+4.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.00

1.66

+14.34

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is higher than the XDAX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and XDAX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than XDAX.L's maximum drawdown of -53.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and XDAX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDJP.LXDAX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-53.95%

-46.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-12.83%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-13.98%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-23.44%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

-43.99%

+20.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-3.32%

-96.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-13.17%

-86.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

4.10%

+0.39%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 9.38% compared to Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (XDAX.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDAX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDJP.LXDAX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.38%

3.58%

+5.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.49%

12.57%

+6.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.95%

15.10%

+8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

18.95%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

19.44%

-2.07%

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDJP.L and XDAX.L have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDJP.L vs. XDAX.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while XDAX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDAX.L
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
0.97%1.33%1.41%1.60%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDJP.L and XDAX.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L and XDAX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

XDJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XDAX.L is Europe Equities. XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XDAX.L tracks FSE DAX TR EUR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and XDAX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer