PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while VJPB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VJPB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than VJPB.L's 16.20% return.


XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%

VJPB.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
6.30%
YTD
16.20%
6M
15.61%
1Y
33.91%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%-0.88%
VJPB.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating
16.20%17.98%8.49%13.45%-6.28%1.76%12.11%-2.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and VJPB.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.90

The correlation between XDJP.L and VJPB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDJP.L
VJPB.L

Technology

31.9%
17.4%

Industrials

19.4%
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.9%
12.8%

Communication Services

12.4%
7.1%

Healthcare

6.7%
5.9%

Basic Materials

4.3%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.2%

Financial Services

3.1%
15.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
3.4%

Energy

0.3%
1.0%

Utilities

0.2%
1.3%

Technology

XDJP.L
31.9%
VJPB.L
17.4%

Industrials

XDJP.L
19.4%
VJPB.L
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XDJP.L
16.9%
VJPB.L
12.8%

Communication Services

XDJP.L
12.4%
VJPB.L
7.1%

Healthcare

XDJP.L
6.7%
VJPB.L
5.9%

Basic Materials

XDJP.L
4.3%
VJPB.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

XDJP.L
3.3%
VJPB.L
4.2%

Financial Services

XDJP.L
3.1%
VJPB.L
15.9%

Real Estate

XDJP.L
1.5%
VJPB.L
3.4%

Energy

XDJP.L
0.3%
VJPB.L
1.0%

Utilities

XDJP.L
0.2%
VJPB.L
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VJPB.L
VJPB.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VJPB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDJP.LVJPB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

3.16

+1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

10.23

+4.27

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the VJPB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and VJPB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDJP.LVJPB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

1.91

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.65

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.53

+0.22

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, roughly equal to the maximum VJPB.L drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and VJPB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDJP.LVJPB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

-24.65%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-10.67%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-13.60%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-18.32%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.19%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-5.34%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

3.31%

+1.11%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) at 3.88%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDJP.LVJPB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

3.88%

+2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.68%

14.42%

+3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

17.70%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

15.47%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

16.69%

+0.94%

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while VJPB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VJPB.L
Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDJP.L and VJPB.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.15% for VJPB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and VJPB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer