XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L
XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) and VJPB.L (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from Xtrackers and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDJP.L returned 12.61%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for VJPB.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDJP.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPB.L.
Performance
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while VJPB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VJPB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than VJPB.L's 16.20% return.
XDJP.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 29.24%
- 1Y
- 64.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
VJPB.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 16.20%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 33.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.55%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- —
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 31.98% | 21.04% | 9.67% | 15.52% | -10.26% | -3.79% | 21.77% | -0.88% |
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 16.20% | 17.98% | 8.49% | 13.45% | -6.28% | 1.76% | 12.11% | -2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDJP.L and VJPB.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XDJP.L and VJPB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Technology
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Industrials
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Communication Services
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Healthcare
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Basic Materials
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Consumer Defensive
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Financial Services
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Real Estate
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Energy
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Utilities
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDJP.L
VJPB.L
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDJP.L | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.36 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 3.16 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.50 | 10.23 | +4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDJP.L | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 1.91 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.65 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.53 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, roughly equal to the maximum VJPB.L drawdown of -24.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and VJPB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDJP.L | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -24.65% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | -10.67% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.82% | -13.60% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -18.32% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.19% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -5.34% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 3.31% | +1.11% |
Volatility
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPB.L) at 3.88%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDJP.L | VJPB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 3.88% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 14.42% | +3.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 17.70% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 15.47% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 16.69% | +0.94% |
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VJPB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDJP.L vs. VJPB.L - Dividend Comparison
XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while VJPB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VJPB.L Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.47% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDJP.L and VJPB.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VJPB.L.
Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.15% for VJPB.L.
Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and VJPB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer