PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than TPXG.L's 14.95% return.


XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%

TPXG.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.60%
YTD
14.95%
6M
14.59%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.58%-3.53%8.94%
TPXG.L
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY
14.95%18.33%8.12%13.45%-6.05%2.07%7.12%8.68%-2.90%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and TPXG.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.42

Over the past year, XDJP.L and TPXG.L have become more correlated (0.80) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDJP.L
TPXG.L

Technology

31.9%
10.7%

Industrials

19.4%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

16.9%
19.2%

Communication Services

12.4%
7.4%

Healthcare

6.7%
15.1%

Basic Materials

4.3%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.7%

Financial Services

3.1%
20.0%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.5%

Energy

0.3%
3.7%

Utilities

0.2%
3.0%

Technology

XDJP.L
31.9%
TPXG.L
10.7%

Industrials

XDJP.L
19.4%
TPXG.L
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XDJP.L
16.9%
TPXG.L
19.2%

Communication Services

XDJP.L
12.4%
TPXG.L
7.4%

Healthcare

XDJP.L
6.7%
TPXG.L
15.1%

Basic Materials

XDJP.L
4.3%
TPXG.L
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDJP.L
3.3%
TPXG.L
4.7%

Financial Services

XDJP.L
3.1%
TPXG.L
20.0%

Real Estate

XDJP.L
1.5%
TPXG.L
1.5%

Energy

XDJP.L
0.3%
TPXG.L
3.7%

Utilities

XDJP.L
0.2%
TPXG.L
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TPXG.L
TPXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDJP.LTPXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.35

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

3.01

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

9.66

+4.84

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and TPXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDJP.LTPXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

1.84

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.98

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.87

-0.12

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, roughly equal to the maximum TPXG.L drawdown of -22.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and TPXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDJP.LTPXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

-22.96%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-10.57%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-12.96%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-18.00%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.19%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-4.42%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

3.30%

+1.12%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDJP.LTPXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

3.74%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.68%

14.16%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

17.29%

+5.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

20.10%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

24.48%

-6.85%

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TPXG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDJP.L vs. TPXG.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while TPXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TPXG.L
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDJP.L and TPXG.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TPXG.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.20% for TPXG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and TPXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer