PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDJP.L vs. N4US.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while N4US.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the N4US.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 24.42% return, which is significantly higher than N4US.L's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has underperformed N4US.L with an annualized return of 11.24%, while N4US.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.03% annualized return.


XDJP.L

1D
-2.67%
1M
-10.09%
6M
16.93%
YTD
24.42%
1Y
49.05%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*
11.24%

N4US.L

1D
-1.85%
1M
-3.94%
6M
10.74%
YTD
18.97%
1Y
45.07%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
22.44%
10Y*
16.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
24.42%21.04%9.68%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.59%-3.53%14.74%
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
18.97%20.97%25.93%29.18%10.71%12.23%7.53%14.95%-10.75%12.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and N4US.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2015

0.78

The correlation between XDJP.L and N4US.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

N4US.L
N4US.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
N4US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
N4US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
N4US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
N4US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
N4US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDJP.LN4US.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

5.23

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

16.75

-6.72

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the N4US.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and N4US.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than N4US.L's maximum drawdown of -28.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and N4US.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDJP.LN4US.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-28.61%

-71.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.49%

-8.58%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-20.94%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-20.94%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

-28.61%

+4.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-5.90%

-94.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-5.12%

-94.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

2.68%

+2.20%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (N4US.L) at 6.00%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than N4US.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDJP.LN4US.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

6.00%

+3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.69%

15.65%

+5.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.11%

19.76%

+5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.43%

19.07%

-0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

19.47%

-1.97%

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than N4US.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDJP.L vs. N4US.L - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while N4US.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
N4US.L
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.10%1.33%1.41%1.60%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDJP.L and N4US.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for N4US.L.

XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while N4US.L tracks JPX-Nikkei 400 USD Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.19% for N4US.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and N4US.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer