XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L
XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) and IJPD.L (iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Japan Equities funds - XDJP.L tracks the TOPIX TR JPY while IJPD.L tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Net TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L returned 13.14%/yr vs 16.90%/yr for IJPD.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDJP.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for IJPD.L.
Performance
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while IJPD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDJP.L achieves a 31.98% return, which is significantly higher than IJPD.L's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has underperformed IJPD.L with an annualized return of 13.14%, while IJPD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.90% annualized return.
XDJP.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 29.24%
- 1Y
- 64.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
IJPD.L
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 7.82%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 54.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.56%
- 5Y*
- 22.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.90%
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 31.98% | 21.04% | 9.67% | 15.52% | -10.26% | -3.79% | 21.77% | 16.58% | -3.53% | 14.73% |
IJPD.L iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating | 20.63% | 19.85% | 26.31% | 28.81% | 8.45% | 13.28% | 7.55% | 14.22% | -9.17% | 10.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDJP.L and IJPD.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2013 | 0.67 |
The correlation between XDJP.L and IJPD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
Technology
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Industrials
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Communication Services
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Healthcare
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Basic Materials
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Consumer Defensive
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Financial Services
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Real Estate
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Energy
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Utilities
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDJP.L
IJPD.L
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDJP.L | IJPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 6.35 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.50 | 20.85 | -6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDJP.L | IJPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.74 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 1.17 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.86 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.73 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, smaller than the maximum IJPD.L drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and IJPD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDJP.L | IJPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -28.78% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | -8.52% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.82% | -21.36% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -21.36% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.69% | -28.78% | +5.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.42% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -5.38% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 2.60% | +1.82% |
Volatility
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating (IJPD.L) at 3.47%. This indicates that XDJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDJP.L | IJPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 3.47% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 15.28% | +2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 19.81% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 19.18% | -1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 19.68% | -2.05% |
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDJP.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IJPD.L's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDJP.L vs. IJPD.L - Dividend Comparison
XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while IJPD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJPD.L iShares MSCI Japan USD Hedged UCITS ETF Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.47% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 0.72% | 0.83% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDJP.L and IJPD.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for IJPD.L.
XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while IJPD.L tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Net TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDJP.L and 0.64% for IJPD.L.
Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and IJPD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer