XDJP.L vs. ^N225
XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) is Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while ^N225 (Nikkei 225) is an index. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L returned 13.14%/yr vs 11.40%/yr for ^N225. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while ^N225 is traded in JPY. To make them comparable, the ^N225 values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDJP.L having a 31.98% return and ^N225 slightly lower at 31.65%. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has outperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 13.14%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively lower 11.40% annualized return.
XDJP.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 10.95%
- YTD
- 31.98%
- 6M
- 29.24%
- 1Y
- 64.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
^N225
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 12.70%
- YTD
- 31.65%
- 6M
- 27.40%
- 1Y
- 61.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 31.98% | 21.04% | 9.67% | 15.52% | -10.26% | -3.79% | 21.77% | 16.58% | -3.53% | 14.73% |
^N225 Nikkei 225 | 31.65% | 17.94% | 8.72% | 13.25% | -11.23% | -5.05% | 17.82% | 15.96% | -4.44% | 13.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDJP.L and ^N225 is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013 | 0.45 |
The correlation between XDJP.L and ^N225 has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDJP.L vs. ^N225 — Risk / Return Rank
XDJP.L
^N225
XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDJP.L | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 4.90 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.50 | 14.52 | -0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDJP.L | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.77 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.50 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.56 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.35 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, smaller than the maximum ^N225 drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and ^N225.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDJP.L | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.69% | -35.55% | +11.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | -13.44% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.82% | -22.75% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.61% | -23.10% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.69% | -24.67% | +0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -1.26% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -8.69% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 4.48% | -0.06% |
Volatility
XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Nikkei 225 (^N225) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDJP.L | ^N225 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 6.97% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 19.36% | -1.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.44% | 23.82% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 22.77% | -5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 21.18% | -3.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDJP.L and ^N225 have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and ^N225
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer