PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDJP.L vs. ^N225
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDJP.L is traded in GBp, while ^N225 is traded in JPY. To make them comparable, the ^N225 values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDJP.L having a 31.98% return and ^N225 slightly lower at 31.65%. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.L has outperformed ^N225 with an annualized return of 13.14%, while ^N225 has yielded a comparatively lower 11.40% annualized return.


XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%

^N225

1D
0.00%
1M
12.70%
YTD
31.65%
6M
27.40%
1Y
61.15%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.58%-3.53%14.73%
^N225
Nikkei 225
31.65%17.94%8.72%13.25%-11.23%-5.05%17.82%15.96%-4.44%13.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.L and ^N225 is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013

0.45

The correlation between XDJP.L and ^N225 has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDJP.L vs. ^N225 — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

^N225
^N225 Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
^N225 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^N225 Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
^N225 Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
^N225 Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
^N225 Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Nikkei 225 (^N225). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDJP.L^N225Difference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

4.90

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

14.52

-0.02

XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the ^N225 Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.L and ^N225, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDJP.L^N225Difference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.77

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.50

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.56

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.35

+0.40

Drawdowns

XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.L drawdown since its inception was -23.69%, smaller than the maximum ^N225 drawdown of -35.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.L and ^N225.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDJP.L^N225Difference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.69%

-35.55%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-13.44%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.82%

-22.75%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.61%

-23.10%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

-24.67%

+0.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-1.26%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.79%

-8.69%

+1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

4.48%

-0.06%

Volatility

XDJP.L vs. ^N225 - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) and Nikkei 225 (^N225) have volatilities of 6.75% and 6.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDJP.L^N225Difference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

6.97%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.68%

19.36%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.44%

23.82%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

22.77%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.63%

21.18%

-3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDJP.L and ^N225 have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDJP.L and ^N225

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer