PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) and Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund (PHE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDIV.TO achieves a 29.20% return, which is significantly higher than PHE.TO's 2.81% return.


XDIV.TO

1D
0.17%
1M
5.65%
6M
27.57%
YTD
29.20%
1Y
46.87%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
18.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.97%

PHE.TO

1D
1.45%
1M
1.67%
6M
2.79%
YTD
2.81%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
9.92%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
7.11%
ALL TIME*
5.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$66.46KCA$30.59KCA$12.26K
CA$9.07MCA$8.75MCA$8.92M

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
29.20%25.04%19.84%11.95%0.49%33.31%-7.53%25.14%-9.81%8.81%
PHE.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund
2.81%12.04%12.63%10.64%-9.81%20.76%2.62%8.65%-7.89%9.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XDIV.TO and PHE.TO is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.17

The correlation between XDIV.TO and PHE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PHE.TO
PHE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PHE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PHE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) and Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund (PHE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDIV.TOPHE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.11

1.19

+0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

16.59

1.23

+15.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

54.78

4.95

+49.83

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.35, which is higher than the PHE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDIV.TO and PHE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, which is greater than PHE.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDIV.TO and PHE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDIV.TOPHE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.29%

-22.37%

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-6.54%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.53%

-11.34%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.33%

-17.48%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-5.22%

+0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

1.63%

-0.79%

Volatility

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) and Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund (PHE.TO) have volatilities of 2.31% and 2.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDIV.TOPHE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.27%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.72%

5.99%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.65%

7.62%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

9.64%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.26%

10.14%

+6.12%

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDIV.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PHE.TO's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDIV.TO vs. PHE.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, while PHE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHE.TO
Purpose Tactical Hedged Equity Fund
0.00%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.08%3.90%4.50%4.42%4.15%3.76%4.85%4.24%5.13%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDIV.TO and PHE.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PHE.TO.

XDIV.TO is categorized as Quality Factor, while PHE.TO is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for XDIV.TO and 0.98% for PHE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDIV.TO and PHE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer