PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDGU.L is traded in USD, while XDJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDJP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDGU.L achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 31.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XDGU.L has underperformed XDJP.L with an annualized return of 2.63%, while XDJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.


XDGU.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.50%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.47%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
2.63%

XDJP.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
10.01%
YTD
31.66%
6M
30.19%
1Y
62.73%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDGU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D
0.16%7.97%1.52%9.07%-17.66%-1.76%10.73%18.12%-3.94%7.08%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
31.66%30.18%7.85%21.61%-19.86%-4.66%25.50%21.26%-8.99%25.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XDGU.L and XDJP.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2015

0.18

The correlation between XDGU.L and XDJP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDGU.L
XDGU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XDGU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDGU.LXDJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.42

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

4.06

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.98

13.32

-8.35

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDGU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDGU.L and XDJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDGU.LXDJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.55

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.57

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.68

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.66

-0.29

Drawdowns

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDGU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.18%, smaller than the maximum XDJP.L drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDGU.L and XDJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDGU.LXDJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.18%

-35.79%

+10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-15.36%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.70%

-19.06%

+11.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-33.97%

+8.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.18%

-35.79%

+10.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-1.30%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-8.91%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

4.69%

-3.54%

Volatility

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.L) is 1.96%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that XDGU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDGU.LXDJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

7.26%

-5.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

19.36%

-15.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.40%

24.50%

-19.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.36%

19.97%

-11.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.06%

18.97%

-10.91%

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDGU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDGU.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison

XDGU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than XDJP.L's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDGU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D
4.75%4.59%5.63%4.06%4.07%5.93%3.74%2.98%2.97%3.09%0.29%0.00%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDGU.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XDGU.L.

XDGU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. XDGU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XDGU.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDGU.L and XDJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer