PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDGU.DE achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than SYBN.DE's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XDGU.DE has underperformed SYBN.DE with an annualized return of 1.77%, while SYBN.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 2.22% annualized return.


XDGU.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.98%
6M
0.29%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
1.77%

SYBN.DE

1D
0.30%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.97%
6M
0.93%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDGU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D
0.98%-4.06%6.36%5.11%-12.82%5.84%0.25%20.55%-0.32%-6.11%
SYBN.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.97%-4.34%4.09%6.87%-20.46%6.88%3.21%27.52%-2.77%-1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between XDGU.DE and SYBN.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015

0.85

The correlation between XDGU.DE and SYBN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDGU.DE
XDGU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
XDGU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDGU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SYBN.DE
SYBN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SYBN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDGU.DESYBN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.11

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

1.02

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.97

2.15

-0.18

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDGU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the SYBN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDGU.DE and SYBN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDGU.DESYBN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

0.63

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

-0.06

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.18

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.21

0.00

Drawdowns

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDGU.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, smaller than the maximum SYBN.DE drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDGU.DE and SYBN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDGU.DESYBN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-28.03%

+8.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

-4.99%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.28%

-15.40%

+3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-28.03%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.37%

-28.03%

+8.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.05%

-16.22%

+9.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-9.94%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

2.37%

-0.84%

Volatility

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D (XDGU.DE) is 1.35%, while SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SYBN.DE) has a volatility of 2.10%. This indicates that XDGU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SYBN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDGU.DESYBN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.10%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.31%

5.72%

-1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16%

8.15%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.24%

12.47%

-3.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.24%

12.40%

-2.16%

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDGU.DE and SYBN.DE have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDGU.DE vs. SYBN.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDGU.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than SYBN.DE's 5.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SYBN.DE
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
5.43%5.75%5.08%4.61%4.65%3.20%3.62%3.61%3.99%4.44%2.62%
XDGU.DE
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bonds UCITS ETF 1D
4.07%4.30%5.04%3.85%3.89%4.75%3.58%2.64%2.25%3.30%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, XDGU.DE and SYBN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDGU.DE and SYBN.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.

XDGU.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while SYBN.DE tracks Bloomberg US Corporate 10+. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDGU.DE and SYBN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer