XDEX.L vs. LDME.L
XDEX.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and LDME.L (L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XDEX.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD while LDME.L tracks the L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEX.L returned 11.22%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for LDME.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEX.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LDME.L.
Performance
XDEX.L vs. LDME.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEX.L achieves a 29.84% return, which is significantly higher than LDME.L's 11.94% return.
XDEX.L
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- 6M
- 23.01%
- YTD
- 29.84%
- 1Y
- 52.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.24%
LDME.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- -4.00%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 21.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEX.L vs. LDME.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEX.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 29.84% | 28.16% | 2.86% | 2.89% | -10.24% | 7.59% |
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 11.94% | 16.54% | 11.33% | 10.64% | -2.34% | 7,358.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEX.L and LDME.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XDEX.L and LDME.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEX.L vs. LDME.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEX.L
LDME.L
XDEX.L vs. LDME.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) and L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDME.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEX.L | LDME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.33 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 3.53 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.71 | 9.38 | +3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEX.L vs. LDME.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEX.L drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, which is greater than LDME.L's maximum drawdown of -14.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEX.L and LDME.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEX.L | LDME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -14.82% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -6.44% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.38% | -14.82% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -14.82% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.55% | -5.29% | -7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -3.24% | -1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 2.42% | +1.69% |
Volatility
XDEX.L vs. LDME.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.39% compared to L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis (LDME.L) at 3.97%. This indicates that XDEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDME.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEX.L | LDME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.39% | 3.97% | +7.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.39% | 9.77% | +10.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.03% | 12.12% | +9.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 12.65% | +3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 3,216.41% | -3,200.38% |
XDEX.L vs. LDME.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEX.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LDME.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEX.L vs. LDME.L - Dividend Comparison
XDEX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDME.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDME.L L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis | 2.85% | 3.04% | 3.67% | 3.56% | 4.57% | 1.55% |
XDEX.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEX.L and LDME.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEX.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEX.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LDME.L.
XDEX.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while LDME.L tracks L&G Emerging Markets Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF USD Dis. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XDEX.L and 0.45% for LDME.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEX.L and LDME.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer