PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEX.L is traded in GBp, while HTWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HTWD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEX.L achieves a 25.56% return, which is significantly lower than HTWD.L's 51.82% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEX.L has underperformed HTWD.L with an annualized return of 11.80%, while HTWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.91% annualized return.


XDEX.L

1D
-1.41%
1M
-12.07%
6M
17.79%
YTD
25.56%
1Y
46.34%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
11.80%

HTWD.L

1D
-3.97%
1M
-11.64%
6M
41.55%
YTD
51.82%
1Y
73.20%
3Y*
36.89%
5Y*
19.87%
10Y*
19.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEX.L
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
25.56%28.16%2.86%2.89%-10.24%20.08%12.90%21.94%-4.60%14.14%
HTWD.L
HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
51.82%22.83%27.59%22.54%-21.01%28.99%32.61%28.48%-3.30%16.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEX.L and HTWD.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015

0.70

The correlation between XDEX.L and HTWD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (10 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEX.L
XDEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

HTWD.L
HTWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HTWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HTWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEX.LHTWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

4.83

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

18.16

-7.46

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the HTWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEX.L and HTWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEX.L drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum HTWD.L drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEX.L and HTWD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEX.LHTWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-32.66%

+8.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-15.07%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.38%

-29.82%

+12.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.65%

-30.12%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.54%

-30.12%

+5.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.43%

-15.07%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-7.45%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

4.02%

+0.30%

Volatility

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) and HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HTWD.L) have volatilities of 10.45% and 10.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEX.LHTWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.45%

10.84%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.53%

23.02%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.18%

26.48%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

22.21%

-5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

21.12%

-5.08%

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEX.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HTWD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEX.L vs. HTWD.L - Dividend Comparison

XDEX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HTWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTWD.L
HSBC MSCI Taiwan Capped UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.08%1.53%1.18%2.73%3.31%1.13%1.69%2.08%2.79%1.37%2.64%2.65%
XDEX.L
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEX.L and HTWD.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEX.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEX.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HTWD.L.

XDEX.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while HTWD.L tracks MSCI Taiwan Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XDEX.L and 0.50% for HTWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEX.L and HTWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer