XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L
XDEX.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and AUEG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Xtrackers and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEX.L returned 14.10%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for AUEG.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDEX.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AUEG.L.
Performance
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEX.L achieves a 37.51% return, which is significantly higher than AUEG.L's 26.01% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEX.L has outperformed AUEG.L with an annualized return of 14.10%, while AUEG.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.92% annualized return.
XDEX.L
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 37.51%
- 6M
- 42.60%
- 1Y
- 73.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 14.10%
AUEG.L
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 26.01%
- 6M
- 28.10%
- 1Y
- 53.88%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEX.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 37.51% | 28.16% | 2.86% | 2.89% | -10.24% | 20.08% | 12.90% | 21.94% | -4.17% | 13.62% |
AUEG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD | 26.01% | 25.28% | 8.99% | 3.02% | -10.18% | -2.18% | 14.26% | 13.31% | -9.74% | 25.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEX.L and AUEG.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2015 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XDEX.L and AUEG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Financial Services
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Industrials
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Basic Materials
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Energy
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Communication Services
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Consumer Defensive
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Utilities
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Healthcare
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Real Estate
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEX.L
AUEG.L
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (AUEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEX.L | AUEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.59 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.83 | 4.89 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.82 | 17.24 | +4.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEX.L | AUEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.06 | 3.20 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.53 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.61 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.63 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEX.L drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum AUEG.L drawdown of -27.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEX.L and AUEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEX.L | AUEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.54% | -27.50% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -10.97% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.38% | -15.37% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -23.59% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.54% | -27.50% | +2.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -2.45% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -9.17% | +4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 3.12% | +0.25% |
Volatility
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (AUEG.L) at 7.40%. This indicates that XDEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEX.L | AUEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 7.40% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.04% | 14.32% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 16.80% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 16.19% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 17.91% | -2.29% |
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEX.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AUEG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEX.L vs. AUEG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEX.L nor AUEG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEX.L and AUEG.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEX.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEX.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AUEG.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XDEX.L and 0.20% for AUEG.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEX.L and AUEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer