PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEV.L is traded in GBp, while GBDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEV.L achieves a 35.10% return, which is significantly higher than GBDV.L's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.L has outperformed GBDV.L with an annualized return of 13.31%, while GBDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.


XDEV.L

1D
-1.90%
1M
5.18%
YTD
35.10%
6M
36.05%
1Y
67.80%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
17.88%
10Y*
13.31%

GBDV.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.21%
YTD
8.69%
6M
8.69%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*
7.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEV.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
35.10%30.51%6.79%13.25%1.01%21.67%-6.88%14.56%-9.23%11.91%
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
8.69%9.25%8.98%1.23%4.57%16.69%-12.13%15.83%-3.84%8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEV.L and GBDV.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2014

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between XDEV.L and GBDV.L has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEV.L
GBDV.L

Technology

41.7%
2.9%

Financial Services

13.3%
23.0%

Industrials

10.1%
12.0%

Healthcare

7.8%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
1.3%

Communication Services

6.4%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
8.4%

Energy

3.1%
7.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.3%

Utilities

2.1%
16.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
11.4%

Technology

XDEV.L
41.7%
GBDV.L
2.9%

Financial Services

XDEV.L
13.3%
GBDV.L
23.0%

Industrials

XDEV.L
10.1%
GBDV.L
12.0%

Healthcare

XDEV.L
7.8%
GBDV.L
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEV.L
7.4%
GBDV.L
1.3%

Communication Services

XDEV.L
6.4%
GBDV.L
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

XDEV.L
3.9%
GBDV.L
8.4%

Energy

XDEV.L
3.1%
GBDV.L
7.8%

Basic Materials

XDEV.L
2.7%
GBDV.L
2.3%

Utilities

XDEV.L
2.1%
GBDV.L
16.9%

Real Estate

XDEV.L
1.5%
GBDV.L
11.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEV.L
XDEV.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GBDV.L
GBDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEV.LGBDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.90

1.40

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.75

3.16

+6.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

35.92

9.79

+26.13

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.78, which is higher than the GBDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEV.L and GBDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEV.L drawdown since its inception was -45.89%, which is greater than GBDV.L's maximum drawdown of -40.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEV.L and GBDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEV.LGBDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.89%

-40.46%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.92%

-6.06%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.90%

-13.57%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-16.18%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.20%

-34.77%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-0.41%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.34%

-11.60%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.96%

-0.08%

Volatility

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (GBDV.L) at 1.90%. This indicates that XDEV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEV.LGBDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

1.90%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

6.45%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.13%

8.70%

+5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.99%

11.74%

+7.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

14.09%

+6.89%

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEV.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GBDV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEV.L vs. GBDV.L - Dividend Comparison

XDEV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDV.L
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
3.84%4.21%3.80%4.25%4.26%3.68%3.91%3.60%3.87%3.28%3.49%3.73%
XDEV.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEV.L and GBDV.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GBDV.L.

XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while GBDV.L tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEV.L and 0.45% for GBDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEV.L and GBDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer