XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L
XDEV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and XLVS.L (Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEV.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while XLVS.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.DE returned 12.54%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for XLVS.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEV.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLVS.L.
Performance
XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEV.DE is traded in EUR, while XLVS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLVS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEV.DE achieves a 36.28% return, which is significantly higher than XLVS.L's -3.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.DE has outperformed XLVS.L with an annualized return of 12.54%, while XLVS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.
XDEV.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 16.24%
- YTD
- 36.28%
- 6M
- 40.37%
- 1Y
- 64.43%
- 3Y*
- 27.19%
- 5Y*
- 17.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
XLVS.L
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -3.82%
- 1Y
- 10.43%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEV.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 36.28% | 24.76% | 11.62% | 15.67% | -4.96% | 30.90% | -12.53% | 22.09% | -10.42% | 7.82% |
XLVS.L Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | -3.81% | 1.16% | 8.89% | -1.49% | 3.41% | 37.12% | 2.81% | 23.27% | 9.20% | 6.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEV.DE and XLVS.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014 | 0.55 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDEV.DE and XLVS.L has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEV.DE
XLVS.L
XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) and Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEV.DE | XLVS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.83 | 1.12 | +0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.60 | 0.96 | +9.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.99 | 2.36 | +37.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEV.DE | XLVS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63 | 0.68 | +3.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.41 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.54 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.70 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEV.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.28%, which is greater than XLVS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEV.DE and XLVS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEV.DE | XLVS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.28% | -25.87% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.05% | -10.80% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -22.64% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | -22.64% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.28% | -25.87% | -9.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -9.62% | +9.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -5.45% | -0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 4.41% | -2.80% |
Volatility
XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L) at 4.68%. This indicates that XDEV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLVS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEV.DE | XLVS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 4.68% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 10.67% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 15.39% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 15.03% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 16.15% | -0.25% |
XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEV.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEV.DE vs. XLVS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEV.DE nor XLVS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEV.DE and XLVS.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.DE.
XDEV.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XLVS.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while XLVS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEV.DE and 0.14% for XLVS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEV.DE and XLVS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer