XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L
XDEV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and RMAU.L (The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEV.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while RMAU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEV.DE returned 17.23%/yr vs 18.34%/yr for RMAU.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDEV.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for RMAU.L.
Performance
XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEV.DE is traded in EUR, while RMAU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RMAU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEV.DE achieves a 34.69% return, which is significantly higher than RMAU.L's -0.49% return.
XDEV.DE
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 34.69%
- 6M
- 37.13%
- 1Y
- 62.50%
- 3Y*
- 25.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.69%
RMAU.L
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -8.85%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 25.35%
- 3Y*
- 26.22%
- 5Y*
- 18.34%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEV.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 34.69% | 24.74% | 11.64% | 15.69% | -4.81% | 30.64% | -14.87% |
RMAU.L The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities | -0.49% | 45.06% | 34.28% | 9.89% | 6.00% | 3.00% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEV.DE and RMAU.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2020 | 0.07 |
The correlation between XDEV.DE and RMAU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEV.DE
RMAU.L
XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) and The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEV.DE | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.21 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.28 | 1.12 | +9.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.44 | 3.45 | +34.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEV.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than RMAU.L's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEV.DE and RMAU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEV.DE | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -22.59% | -12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.05% | -22.59% | +16.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -22.59% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | -22.59% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -19.73% | +18.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -6.10% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 7.34% | -5.68% |
Volatility
XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) is 5.99%, while The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that XDEV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMAU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEV.DE | RMAU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 7.48% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 21.98% | -10.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 24.74% | -10.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 17.00% | -2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 17.17% | -0.48% |
XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEV.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than RMAU.L's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEV.DE vs. RMAU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEV.DE nor RMAU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEV.DE and RMAU.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMAU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMAU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.DE.
XDEV.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while RMAU.L is Commodities. XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while RMAU.L tracks LBMA Gold PM Price. They also come from different issuers: DWS and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEV.DE and 0.22% for RMAU.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEV.DE and RMAU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer