XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L
XDEV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and QCLN.L (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEV.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while QCLN.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEV.DE returned 17.56%/yr vs 2.66%/yr for QCLN.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEV.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.L.
Performance
XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEV.DE is traded in EUR, while QCLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QCLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEV.DE achieves a 36.28% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN.L's 54.70% return.
XDEV.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 16.24%
- YTD
- 36.28%
- 6M
- 40.37%
- 1Y
- 64.43%
- 3Y*
- 27.19%
- 5Y*
- 17.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
QCLN.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 18.75%
- YTD
- 54.70%
- 6M
- 54.34%
- 1Y
- 118.47%
- 3Y*
- 8.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEV.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 36.28% | 24.76% | 11.62% | 15.67% | -4.96% | 23.59% |
QCLN.L First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 54.70% | 13.82% | -13.98% | -10.81% | -27.22% | -13.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEV.DE and QCLN.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XDEV.DE and QCLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEV.DE
QCLN.L
XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEV.DE | QCLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.83 | 1.46 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.60 | 8.11 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.99 | 25.95 | +14.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEV.DE | QCLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63 | 3.40 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.07 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | -0.08 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEV.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.28%, smaller than the maximum QCLN.L drawdown of -69.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEV.DE and QCLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEV.DE | QCLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.28% | -69.23% | +33.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.05% | -14.53% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -56.09% | +38.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | -69.23% | +51.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -19.03% | +18.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -39.83% | +34.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 4.55% | -2.94% |
Volatility
XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) is 5.66%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.L) has a volatility of 14.62%. This indicates that XDEV.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEV.DE | QCLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 14.62% | -8.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 24.89% | -13.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 34.83% | -20.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 36.36% | -22.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 37.38% | -21.48% |
XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEV.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDEV.DE vs. QCLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEV.DE nor QCLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEV.DE and QCLN.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEV.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEV.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.L.
XDEV.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while QCLN.L is Energy Equities. XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while QCLN.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEV.DE and 0.60% for QCLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEV.DE and QCLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer