XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L
XDEV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and IUHC.L (iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEV.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while IUHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.DE returned 12.69%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for IUHC.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEV.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUHC.L.
Performance
XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEV.DE is traded in EUR, while IUHC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUHC.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEV.DE achieves a 34.69% return, which is significantly higher than IUHC.L's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEV.DE has outperformed IUHC.L with an annualized return of 12.69%, while IUHC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.
XDEV.DE
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 34.69%
- 6M
- 37.13%
- 1Y
- 62.50%
- 3Y*
- 25.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.69%
IUHC.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.80%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 14.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEV.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 34.69% | 24.74% | 11.64% | 15.69% | -4.81% | 30.64% | -12.50% | 22.05% | -10.40% | 7.82% |
IUHC.L iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.64% | 1.11% | 8.91% | -1.33% | 3.40% | 37.13% | 2.70% | 23.28% | 9.43% | 7.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEV.DE and IUHC.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XDEV.DE and IUHC.L has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEV.DE
IUHC.L
XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDEV.DE | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.17 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.28 | 1.35 | +8.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.44 | 3.33 | +34.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEV.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, which is greater than IUHC.L's maximum drawdown of -26.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEV.DE and IUHC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEV.DE | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -26.48% | -8.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.05% | -10.81% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -22.64% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | -22.64% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | -26.48% | -8.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -5.41% | +4.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.92% | -5.34% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 4.31% | -2.65% |
Volatility
XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to iShares S&P 500 Health Care Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUHC.L) at 5.51%. This indicates that XDEV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUHC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEV.DE | IUHC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 5.51% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 11.15% | +0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 15.61% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 15.20% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 16.41% | +0.28% |
XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEV.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IUHC.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEV.DE vs. IUHC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEV.DE nor IUHC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEV.DE and IUHC.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUHC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUHC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.DE.
XDEV.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IUHC.L is Health & Biotech Equities. XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while IUHC.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEV.DE and 0.15% for IUHC.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEV.DE and IUHC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer