XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE
XDEV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - XDEV.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD while F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEV.DE returned 17.56%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for F50A.DE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEV.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for F50A.DE.
Performance
XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEV.DE achieves a 36.28% return, which is significantly higher than F50A.DE's 10.85% return.
XDEV.DE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 16.24%
- YTD
- 36.28%
- 6M
- 40.37%
- 1Y
- 64.43%
- 3Y*
- 27.19%
- 5Y*
- 17.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
F50A.DE
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEV.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 36.28% | 24.76% | 11.62% | 15.67% | -4.96% | 30.90% | -13.69% |
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.85% | 8.58% | 25.85% | 19.91% | -13.61% | 32.73% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEV.DE and F50A.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XDEV.DE and F50A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDEV.DE
F50A.DE
XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEV.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.83 | 1.40 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.60 | 3.67 | +6.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.99 | 14.65 | +25.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEV.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63 | 2.17 | +2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | 0.88 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEV.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.28%, which is greater than F50A.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEV.DE and F50A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEV.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.28% | -32.88% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.05% | -6.62% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -21.49% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.02% | -21.49% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -0.35% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -4.73% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 1.66% | -0.05% |
Volatility
XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) at 2.79%. This indicates that XDEV.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F50A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEV.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 2.79% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 7.95% | +3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 11.21% | +2.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.96% | 14.60% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 17.71% | -1.81% |
XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEV.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEV.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEV.DE nor F50A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEV.DE and F50A.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEV.DE.
XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEV.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDEV.DE and F50A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer