XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE
XDEQ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - XDEQ.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD while F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEQ.DE returned 11.42%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for F50A.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDEQ.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for F50A.DE.
Performance
XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEQ.DE achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than F50A.DE's 10.81% return.
XDEQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 19.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
F50A.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 9.48% | 2.87% | 23.81% | 21.83% | -14.94% | 34.64% | -1.36% |
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.81% | 8.58% | 25.85% | 19.91% | -13.61% | 32.73% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEQ.DE and F50A.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XDEQ.DE and F50A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDEQ.DE
F50A.DE
XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEQ.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.66 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.17 | 14.61 | -2.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEQ.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 2.17 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.88 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.71 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.16%, roughly equal to the maximum F50A.DE drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEQ.DE and F50A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEQ.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.16% | -32.88% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.22% | -6.62% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.59% | -21.49% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.59% | -21.49% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.39% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -4.72% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.66% | -0.10% |
Volatility
XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) is 2.36%, while Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that XDEQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than F50A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEQ.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 2.63% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.32% | 7.95% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.64% | 11.18% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 14.60% | -0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 17.70% | -2.35% |
XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEQ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEQ.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEQ.DE nor F50A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XDEQ.DE and F50A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEQ.DE.
XDEQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEQ.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDEQ.DE and F50A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer