XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE
XDEM.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and XDEV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEM.L is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index, while XDEV.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.L returned 17.01%/yr vs 13.66%/yr for XDEV.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEM.L is traded in GBp, while XDEV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDEV.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEM.L achieves a 23.18% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.DE's 35.08% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.L has outperformed XDEV.DE with an annualized return of 17.01%, while XDEV.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.66% annualized return.
XDEM.L
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 23.18%
- 6M
- 24.68%
- 1Y
- 36.45%
- 3Y*
- 26.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.08%
- 10Y*
- 17.01%
XDEV.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 16.32%
- YTD
- 35.08%
- 6M
- 38.84%
- 1Y
- 69.02%
- 3Y*
- 27.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.66%
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEM.L Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 23.18% | 12.52% | 32.87% | 5.88% | -8.06% | 15.61% | 24.14% | 23.37% | 2.28% | 20.40% |
XDEV.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 35.08% | 31.25% | 6.76% | 13.36% | 0.24% | 21.66% | -7.59% | 15.74% | -9.16% | 12.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEM.L and XDEV.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XDEM.L and XDEV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDEM.L
XDEV.DE
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEM.L | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.93 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 9.70 | -5.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.69 | 38.03 | -22.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEM.L | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 5.09 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.30 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 0.89 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.81 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.DE drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.L and XDEV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEM.L | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -28.43% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -7.08% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.99% | -15.31% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.13% | -15.31% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.42% | -28.43% | +6.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.17% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -4.34% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.81% | +0.51% |
Volatility
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.DE) have volatilities of 5.92% and 5.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEM.L | XDEV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 5.80% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 11.14% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.16% | 13.49% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 13.52% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 15.49% | +1.31% |
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDEM.L and XDEV.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEM.L vs. XDEV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEM.L nor XDEV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEM.L and XDEV.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEM.L and XDEV.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDEM.L is categorized as Momentum, while XDEV.DE is Global Equities. XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while XDEV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XDEM.L and XDEV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer