PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS (IEUX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEM.L achieves a 23.18% return, which is significantly higher than IEUX.L's 5.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.L has outperformed IEUX.L with an annualized return of 17.01%, while IEUX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.45% annualized return.


XDEM.L

1D
1.40%
1M
11.96%
YTD
23.18%
6M
24.68%
1Y
36.45%
3Y*
26.71%
5Y*
15.08%
10Y*
17.01%

IEUX.L

1D
-0.75%
1M
2.94%
YTD
5.97%
6M
8.42%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
23.18%12.52%32.87%5.88%-8.06%15.61%24.14%23.37%2.28%20.40%
IEUX.L
iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS
5.97%25.52%1.87%14.91%-6.98%16.31%7.53%20.67%-9.95%16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.L and IEUX.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.72

The correlation between XDEM.L and IEUX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDEM.L
IEUX.L

Technology

34.6%
11.9%

Industrials

20.5%
21.2%

Financial Services

18.9%
22.7%

Communication Services

7.2%
4.3%

Healthcare

6.0%
12.7%

Basic Materials

4.9%
4.5%

Utilities

2.6%
4.7%

Energy

1.8%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
7.1%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.8%

Technology

XDEM.L
34.6%
IEUX.L
11.9%

Industrials

XDEM.L
20.5%
IEUX.L
21.2%

Financial Services

XDEM.L
18.9%
IEUX.L
22.7%

Communication Services

XDEM.L
7.2%
IEUX.L
4.3%

Healthcare

XDEM.L
6.0%
IEUX.L
12.7%

Basic Materials

XDEM.L
4.9%
IEUX.L
4.5%

Utilities

XDEM.L
2.6%
IEUX.L
4.7%

Energy

XDEM.L
1.8%
IEUX.L
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

XDEM.L
1.2%
IEUX.L
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEM.L
1.2%
IEUX.L
7.1%

Real Estate

XDEM.L
1.0%
IEUX.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.L
XDEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IEUX.L
IEUX.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IEUX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEUX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEUX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IEUX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEUX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) and iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS (IEUX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEM.LIEUX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.67

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.69

5.95

+9.75

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the IEUX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.L and IEUX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEM.LIEUX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.40

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.61

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

0.68

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.40

+0.57

Drawdowns

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.L drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum IEUX.L drawdown of -45.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.L and IEUX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEM.LIEUX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.42%

-45.67%

+23.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-10.76%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-13.16%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

-19.67%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.42%

-27.53%

+5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.15%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-7.45%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.03%

-0.71%

Volatility

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS (IEUX.L) at 4.05%. This indicates that XDEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEUX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEM.LIEUX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

4.05%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.77%

10.61%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.16%

12.88%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.41%

14.69%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

15.44%

+1.36%

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IEUX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEM.L vs. IEUX.L - Dividend Comparison

XDEM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEUX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEUX.L
iShares MSCI Europe ex-UK UCITS
1.98%2.12%2.41%2.33%2.25%1.65%1.44%2.42%2.60%2.23%2.17%2.11%
XDEM.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEM.L and IEUX.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IEUX.L.

XDEM.L is categorized as Momentum, while IEUX.L is Europe Equities. XDEM.L tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while IEUX.L tracks MSCI Europe ex-UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEM.L and 0.40% for IEUX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEM.L and IEUX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer