XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L
XDEM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C) and XMMS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XDEM.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum Index, while XMMS.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDEM.DE returned 14.74%/yr vs 8.31%/yr for XMMS.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDEM.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMMS.L.
Performance
XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDEM.DE is traded in EUR, while XMMS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMMS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDEM.DE achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly lower than XMMS.L's 27.85% return.
XDEM.DE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 22.76%
- 6M
- 23.73%
- 1Y
- 31.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
XMMS.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 27.85%
- 6M
- 29.21%
- 1Y
- 49.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDEM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 22.76% | 8.09% | 38.24% | 8.17% | -13.85% | 25.04% | 16.52% | 31.63% | -7.86% |
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 27.85% | 18.21% | 14.39% | 4.84% | -15.15% | 4.79% | 8.40% | 20.62% | -11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDEM.DE and XMMS.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XDEM.DE and XMMS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDEM.DE
XMMS.L
XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDEM.DE | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.51 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 4.54 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.27 | 16.48 | -3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDEM.DE | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 2.81 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.50 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.44 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, roughly equal to the maximum XMMS.L drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.DE and XMMS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDEM.DE | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -32.14% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -10.88% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.51% | -17.86% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | -24.50% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -2.59% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -9.42% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 3.01% | -0.65% |
Volatility
XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) is 5.80%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that XDEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDEM.DE | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 7.49% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.20% | 14.74% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | 17.64% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 17.10% | +0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 19.40% | -1.55% |
XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMS.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDEM.DE vs. XMMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDEM.DE nor XMMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDEM.DE and XMMS.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMMS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMMS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEM.DE.
XDEM.DE is categorized as Momentum, while XMMS.L is Emerging Markets Equities. XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while XMMS.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEM.DE and 0.18% for XMMS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDEM.DE and XMMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer