PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDEM.DE having a 22.76% return and IS3R.DE slightly lower at 22.51%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDEM.DE having a 15.65% annualized return and IS3R.DE not far behind at 15.31%.


XDEM.DE

1D
-0.95%
1M
8.67%
YTD
22.76%
6M
23.73%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
15.65%

IS3R.DE

1D
-1.01%
1M
8.60%
YTD
22.51%
6M
23.56%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
14.66%
10Y*
15.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
22.76%8.09%38.24%8.17%-13.85%25.04%16.52%31.63%0.79%16.07%
IS3R.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
22.51%8.37%37.95%8.09%-13.60%24.50%16.41%31.50%0.27%16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.DE and IS3R.DE is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014

0.86

The correlation between XDEM.DE and IS3R.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 1.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3R.DE
IS3R.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IS3R.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3R.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEM.DEIS3R.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.48

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

13.30

-0.02

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the IS3R.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.DE and IS3R.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEM.DEIS3R.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.84

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.84

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.88

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.85

+0.05

Drawdowns

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, roughly equal to the maximum IS3R.DE drawdown of -30.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.DE and IS3R.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEM.DEIS3R.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-30.77%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-9.01%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.51%

-23.57%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-23.57%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

-30.77%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.01%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-5.67%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.36%

0.00%

Volatility

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3R.DE) have volatilities of 5.80% and 5.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEM.DEIS3R.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

5.96%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

14.33%

-0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

17.01%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

17.32%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

17.23%

+0.62%

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDEM.DE and IS3R.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEM.DE vs. IS3R.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEM.DE nor IS3R.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, XDEM.DE and IS3R.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.DE and IS3R.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Both ETFs track MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEM.DE and IS3R.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer