PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEM.DE achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than IS3M.DE's 0.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEM.DE has outperformed IS3M.DE with an annualized return of 15.65%, while IS3M.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.01% annualized return.


XDEM.DE

1D
-0.95%
1M
8.67%
YTD
22.76%
6M
23.73%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
15.65%

IS3M.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.01%
1Y
2.26%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
1.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
22.76%8.09%38.24%8.17%-13.85%25.04%16.52%31.63%0.79%16.07%
IS3M.DE
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
0.92%2.61%4.12%3.42%-0.29%-0.36%0.09%0.34%-0.62%-0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.DE and IS3M.DE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3M.DE
IS3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IS3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEM.DEIS3M.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.64

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

7.59

-4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

49.96

-36.69

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the IS3M.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.DE and IS3M.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEM.DEIS3M.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.95

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

2.74

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.91

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.86

+0.04

Drawdowns

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than IS3M.DE's maximum drawdown of -3.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.DE and IS3M.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEM.DEIS3M.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-3.80%

-27.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-0.30%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.51%

-0.47%

-23.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

-1.21%

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

-3.80%

-27.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.01%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-0.29%

-5.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

0.05%

+2.31%

Volatility

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE) at 0.29%. This indicates that XDEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3M.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEM.DEIS3M.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

0.29%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

0.59%

+13.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

0.76%

+16.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

0.76%

+16.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

1.11%

+16.74%

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3M.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEM.DE vs. IS3M.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IS3M.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS3M.DE
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
3.29%2.74%3.80%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.13%
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEM.DE and IS3M.DE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3M.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3M.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEM.DE.

XDEM.DE is categorized as Momentum, while IS3M.DE is Ultrashort Bond. XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while IS3M.DE tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEM.DE and 0.09% for IS3M.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEM.DE and IS3M.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer