PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEM.DE is traded in EUR, while HEMC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HEMC.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEM.DE achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly lower than HEMC.L's 27.45% return.


XDEM.DE

1D
-0.95%
1M
8.67%
YTD
22.76%
6M
23.73%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
15.65%

HEMC.L

1D
-1.74%
1M
6.29%
YTD
27.45%
6M
29.46%
1Y
50.22%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
22.76%8.09%38.24%8.17%3.09%
HEMC.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
27.45%18.23%14.15%4.53%-5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.DE and HEMC.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022

0.50

The correlation between XDEM.DE and HEMC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

HEMC.L
HEMC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HEMC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEMC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEMC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HEMC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEMC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEM.DEHEMC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

4.66

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

16.92

-3.65

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the HEMC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.DE and HEMC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEM.DEHEMC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

2.83

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.92

-0.02

Drawdowns

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than HEMC.L's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.DE and HEMC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEM.DEHEMC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-17.74%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-10.73%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.51%

-17.74%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.68%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-4.92%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.96%

-0.60%

Volatility

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) is 5.80%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that XDEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEMC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEM.DEHEMC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

7.54%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

14.83%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

17.70%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

15.87%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

15.87%

+1.98%

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HEMC.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDEM.DE vs. HEMC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEM.DE nor HEMC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEM.DE and HEMC.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HEMC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HEMC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDEM.DE.

XDEM.DE is categorized as Momentum, while HEMC.L is Emerging Markets Equities. XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while HEMC.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEM.DE and 0.15% for HEMC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEM.DE and HEMC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer