PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDEM.DE having a 22.76% return and CBUH.DE slightly lower at 22.41%.


XDEM.DE

1D
-0.95%
1M
8.67%
YTD
22.76%
6M
23.73%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
15.65%

CBUH.DE

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.74%
YTD
22.41%
6M
23.42%
1Y
31.87%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
22.76%8.09%38.24%8.17%-13.85%1.42%
CBUH.DE
iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
22.41%7.97%28.91%13.46%-17.00%0.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEM.DE and CBUH.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2021

0.95

The correlation between XDEM.DE and CBUH.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUH.DE
CBUH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CBUH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) and iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEM.DECBUH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.38

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.27

13.99

-0.72

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the CBUH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEM.DE and CBUH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEM.DECBUH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

1.99

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.64

+0.26

Drawdowns

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than CBUH.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEM.DE and CBUH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEM.DECBUH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-22.61%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-9.39%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.51%

-22.61%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.51%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-8.55%

+2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.27%

+0.09%

Volatility

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE) at 4.80%. This indicates that XDEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEM.DECBUH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.80%

4.80%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

13.32%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

15.96%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

16.91%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

16.91%

+0.94%

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEM.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUH.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEM.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEM.DE nor CBUH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XDEM.DE and CBUH.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XDEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CBUH.DE.

XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index, while CBUH.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEM.DE and 0.30% for CBUH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEM.DE and CBUH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer