PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDEE.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEE.DE achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBQ.DE's 12.19% return.


XDEE.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
2.61%
6M
11.12%
YTD
10.42%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
11.69%
5Y*
10Y*

4UBQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.52%
6M
12.78%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XDEE.DE
Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
10.42%9.31%10.02%10.87%-15.34%1.66%
4UBQ.DE
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc
12.19%5.39%31.02%24.03%-13.92%6.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEE.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2021

0.68

The correlation between XDEE.DE and 4UBQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEE.DE
XDEE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XDEE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBQ.DE
4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDEE.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDEE.DE4UBQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.42

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.88

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.08

14.86

-7.78

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEE.DE and 4UBQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, roughly equal to the maximum 4UBQ.DE drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEE.DE and 4UBQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEE.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.64%

-23.35%

+0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-6.93%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

-23.35%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.90%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-3.95%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.81%

+0.26%

Volatility

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (XDEE.DE) is 3.13%, while UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that XDEE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEE.DE4UBQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

3.49%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

8.11%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

11.93%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

15.33%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

15.46%

+0.77%

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEE.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEE.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEE.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEE.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XDEE.DE.

XDEE.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (EUR Hedged), while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XDEE.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEE.DE and 4UBQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer