PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDEB.L vs. SMT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDEB.L achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than SMT.L's 27.32% return. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.L has underperformed SMT.L with an annualized return of 7.93%, while SMT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.


XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%

SMT.L

1D
-1.53%
1M
5.30%
YTD
27.32%
6M
42.05%
1Y
51.19%
3Y*
30.43%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
19.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%7.02%
SMT.L
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc
27.32%24.72%18.75%12.46%-45.71%10.46%110.49%24.76%4.64%41.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and SMT.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.46

The correlation between XDEB.L and SMT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SMT.L
SMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDEB.LSMT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.45

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

4.16

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

14.08

-12.94

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the SMT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.L and SMT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDEB.LSMT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

2.54

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.16

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.68

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.56

+0.22

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum SMT.L drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and SMT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDEB.LSMT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-62.61%

+43.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-12.26%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-28.05%

+19.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.19%

-60.11%

+49.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

-60.11%

+40.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-2.27%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-16.03%

+12.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.62%

-1.30%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.66%, while Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDEB.LSMT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

4.49%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

16.02%

-10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

20.11%

-12.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

29.68%

-20.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

28.76%

-17.24%

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMT.L's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDEB.L vs. SMT.L - Dividend Comparison

XDEB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMT.L
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc
0.29%0.37%0.44%0.51%0.51%0.26%0.27%0.54%0.66%0.67%0.93%1.05%
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDEB.L and SMT.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for SMT.L.

They also come from different issuers: DWS and Baillie Gifford Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.31% for SMT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and SMT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer