PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XDEB.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C) and MVOL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from DWS and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDEB.L returned 7.93%/yr vs 7.84%/yr for MVOL.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDEB.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MVOL.L.

Performance

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDEB.L is traded in GBp, while MVOL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MVOL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDEB.L having a 1.04% return and MVOL.L slightly lower at 1.00%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDEB.L having a 7.93% annualized return and MVOL.L not far behind at 7.84%.

XDEB.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.82%
YTD
1.04%
6M
0.90%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
7.93%

MVOL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.61%
YTD
1.00%
6M
0.66%
1Y
2.34%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDEB.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C		1.04%3.40%13.01%1.49%1.23%16.00%-0.96%18.55%3.44%7.02%
MVOL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS		1.07%3.11%13.02%1.92%1.12%15.73%-0.45%17.90%3.39%7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XDEB.L and MVOL.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2014

0.87

The correlation between XDEB.L and MVOL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDEB.L
MVOL.L

Technology

20.1%
20.1%

Financial Services

14.0%
14.0%

Healthcare

13.8%
13.8%

Communication Services

12.1%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
10.9%

Industrials

9.2%
9.2%

Utilities

8.1%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
5.6%

Energy

4.5%
4.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.7%

Technology

XDEB.L
20.1%
MVOL.L
20.1%

Financial Services

XDEB.L
14.0%
MVOL.L
14.0%

Healthcare

XDEB.L
13.8%
MVOL.L
13.8%

Communication Services

XDEB.L
12.1%
MVOL.L
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDEB.L
10.9%
MVOL.L
10.9%

Industrials

XDEB.L
9.2%
MVOL.L
9.2%

Utilities

XDEB.L
8.1%
MVOL.L
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XDEB.L
5.6%
MVOL.L
5.6%

Energy

XDEB.L
4.5%
MVOL.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

XDEB.L
1.1%
MVOL.L
1.1%

Real Estate

XDEB.L
0.7%
MVOL.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS

Often compared with XDEB.L:
XDEB.L vs. MVUS.LXDEB.L vs. XDEM.LXDEB.L vs. SWDA.LXDEB.L vs. XDEQ.LXDEB.L vs. VWRA.LXDEB.L vs. VHYL.ASXDEB.L vs. ISWD.L
Often compared with MVOL.L:
MVOL.L vs. ACWVMVOL.L vs. IWDA.LMVOL.L vs. XDEB.DEMVOL.L vs. VOOMVOL.L vs. XDEM.LMVOL.L vs. USMVMVOL.L vs. SLXX.L

Return for Risk

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDEB.L
XDEB.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
MVOL.L
MVOL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVOL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDEB.LMVOL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.33
0.27

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.54
0.43

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.05

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

0.40

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.14

1.02

+0.12

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDEB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is comparable to the MVOL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDEB.L and MVOL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDEB.LMVOL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

0.27

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.59

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.63

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.79

-0.01

Drawdowns

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDEB.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, roughly equal to the maximum MVOL.L drawdown of -20.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDEB.L and MVOL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDEB.LMVOL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-20.24%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-5.89%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.47%

-8.78%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.19%

-10.44%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

-20.24%

+0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-3.49%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-3.64%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.28%

+0.04%

Volatility

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.L) is 2.66%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS (MVOL.L) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that XDEB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVOL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDEB.LMVOL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.88%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

6.87%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.97%

8.81%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.68%

10.63%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.52%

12.49%

-0.97%

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDEB.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MVOL.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDEB.L vs. MVOL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDEB.L nor MVOL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

XDEB.L and MVOL.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MVOL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDEB.L and 0.35% for MVOL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDEB.L and MVOL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer